The second Republican debate of the 2024 election cycle recently took place at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library and Museum in Simi Valley, California. The event saw seven candidates participating, each with their own unique perspectives on pressing issues. Among them was businessman Vivek Ramaswamy, whose call to end birthright citizenship for children born in the United States to parents who entered the country illegally has ignited a divisive debate.
During the debate, Ramaswamy made a bold statement that immediately drew attention. “I favor ending birthright citizenship for the kids of illegal immigrants in this country,” he declared. This proposal, while not entirely new, has been a point of contention in American politics for years.
Ramaswamy didn’t shy away from addressing the potential criticisms of his stance. “Now, the left will howl about the Constitution and the 14th Amendment. The difference between me and them is I’ve actually read the 14th Amendment,” he asserted. “What it says is that all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the laws and jurisdiction thereof are citizens. So nobody believes that the kid of a Mexican diplomat in this country enjoys birthright citizenship.”
The video of Ramaswamy’s remarks, shared on various social media platforms, received a wide range of reactions. Supporters of his proposal argue that it would incentivize individuals to enter the country through legal means rather than risking illegal immigration. They view it as a pragmatic approach to addressing immigration-related challenges and potential strains on public resources.
One user, echoing this sentiment, commented, “This would de-incentivize people from entering illegally and take the legal route, as many other immigrants do. Not a bad idea.” Another expressed tentative support, stating, “He might get my vote for that one reason alone.” There was also acknowledgment of the potential financial implications, with one user noting, “As an immigrant myself, I think this does solve a huge blank check incentive which would cost us billions in healthcare and other services. Bold statement but a needed step.”
However, not everyone agrees with Vivek Ramaswamy proposal. Critics argue that it overlooks the humanitarian aspect of the issue. One user emphasized the importance of fairness, stating, “Vivek, it’s crucial to remember that every child deserves a fair shot at a future. Let’s work towards comprehensive immigration reform that balances compassion and the rule of law.” Another skeptical user commented, “He’s just saying it to feel good, but once he goes into office, it’s not going to happen.”
The debate over birthright citizenship for the children of illegal immigrants is a complex and longstanding issue in American politics. It involves questions of constitutional interpretation, immigration policy, and social justice. While Ramaswamy’s proposal has ignited passionate discussions among X users, it remains to be seen how his stance will resonate with voters and whether it will shape the broader discourse on immigration during the 2024 election campaign.